Thursday, 10 September 2009

'Virtual Concerns'

Social networking sites, gaming, virtual environments..

Are they harmless fun...a great way of meeting people and keep in touch OR a security risk and a phenomena that undermines our social and educational development.

Tell us what you think?

You might also want to check out and comment on the views of Susan Greenfield and the recent comments by Barack Obama.


Monday, 8 June 2009

Review: Cheltenham Science Festival 2009



The Times Cheltenham Science Festival, which runs every June, has rapidly become one of the most significant science festivals, attracting a wide range of prominent speakers including Robert Winston, Jonathon Porritt, Susan Greenfield, Richard Dawkins, A. C. Grayling, Tony Robinson, Richard Hammond...

The following is a summary of some of the talks this year.

Susan Greenfield on The Individual - Baroness Greenfield raised her concerns about the impact of excessive time spent gaming and using social networking sites. As an expert on the physiology of the brain her concerns focus on how sensitive the brain is to its environment and how the wrong environment limits the development of the brain, affecting attention and the ability to properly socialise. Her new book, 'The Individual,' was motivated by her concern over the uncontrolled impact science and technology and the 2D computer world is having on our lives. She mentioned the increase in ADHA, less empathy in children, higher tolerance for violence. We have more leisure time than ever before, but are we using it in the most enriching ways? Are violent computer games diminishing our sense of consequence, value and meaning? Are we becoming merely passive recipients?

10 Zen Questions - After an out of body experience over 30 years ago Dr Susan Blackmore dedicated her career to parapsychology to find an explanation, concluding eventually that there was nothing out there and becoming an ardent sceptic. Blackmore says to us "Be conscious" and goes on to suggest how difficult it is to define consciousness and understand how the brain gives rise to subjective experiences, it is the 'hard problem' facing science and philosophy. This talk saw her bring in her personal experiences of zen meditation to understand consciousness and the self. Through science, philosophy and zen meditation Blackmore concludes that there is no separate conscious self, consciousness is an illusion, it is just the "brain doing its thing".

Check out her ideas in this video and her summary of Nagel's 'what is it like to be a bat' idea.

Alzheimer's - The current 400,000 UK sufferers of this form of dementia leading to memory loss, confusion, problems with speech and understanding is set to rise as our ageing population increases. We were presented first with a moving personal testimony from a woman who had cared for her husband suffering from Alzheimer's, then a psychiatrist talked about the developments in treatments and finally a sociologist who wanted the emphasis placed back on the personhood of sufferers. The latter has set up alternative theraputic approaches including a special guided tour in partnership with the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

The Future for Stem Cells - Stem cell research has only been around since the 1990's, most treatments take 15 years to develop and reach the public, so it is still early days for some of the possible benefits of this science. That said the panel introduced some exiting treatments that have been successful including treating various problems involving cartilage, such as the recent windpipe replacement and certain forms of blindness. The most difficult areas to tackle will be those that involve the brain e.g., alzheimers. There are two main types of stem cells 1) embryonic 2) tissue - the first is the most versatile, embryonic stem cells can become any part of the body whereas tissue stem cells can only become those parts local to it. Are there ethical issues related to the use of embryos in this research and treatment?

Making the Planet Better - The panel were made up of members of 'Foresight', a government body of experts that predict the impact of our activities, in this case environmental. Speakers focused on both land and sea with a disturbing array of images and facts about the damage already done and predicted. The destruction of ancient coral beds, the 'dead zone' in the Gulf of Mexico and how little time we have to act. The enviromental impacts were tied in with the need to feed an ever growing population and managing a global community that will face problems as a result of environmental change as well as population growth.

Climate Change - Whose Responsibility? - 'Our Government' was the conclusion. Everyone felt that our government had a moral and practical responsibility to lead the way having already made some positive steps (but must examine it's own approach to avoid sending mixed messages such as the expansion of Heathrow airport). Speakers talked about the need for a global view, offering support and education, taking the lead and recognising the narrow window of opportunity in which we have to act.

Pain - After an emotional account of a life lived dealing with chronic pain from a woman who now campaigns for the rights of people in pain, we heard about the exiting work being done by neuroscientist Irene Tracey at Oxford University. Tracey explained that pain is a subjective experience and can differ significantly between people. She gave the examples of a builder screaming in pain with a nail through his foot, when his boot was removed the nail was revealed to have gone between his toes and not through his foot! Vs examples of people voluntarily mutilating themselves and claiming they feel no pain. Pain experience is about a number of factors including not just the physical but the context, your attention, mood etc.. and current research seeks to manage pain by looking at these areas. The final speaker discussed the risks and merits of herbal therapies for pain relief including cannabis.

Digital Footprints - The Ethics - The issues and implications of the many databases we knowing and unknowing belong to. Discussed by philosopher A. C. Grayling who was particularly concerned with our loss of privacy and rights. Also a professor of computer science and the head of security (and ex FBI) for Microsoft offered examples of abuses of information and the degree to which we are exposed. Key issues included the use of surveillance and biometric data with references made to the scenarios presented in the film Minority Report. Grayling emphasised that the governments first duty should be on protecting our rights not on security.

Monday, 6 April 2009

Cheltenham Science Festival Wed 3rd - Sun 7th June


Based at Cheltenham Town Hall this is an event worth attending.
Not just for those studying science but for anyone with an inquiring mind who wants to know more about the world around them. The science festival covers a wide range of topics from 'hard science' to discussions on the ethical implications of scientific progress.

Find out what talks are on here.

The science festival is on during the exam period and could be a great way to break up and enrich your study. A few examples of talks are;

Wednesday
Susan Greenfield on The Individual
10 Zen Questions
Alzheimers
Heresy - Hero or Heretic?

Thursday
The Big Bang and Beyond
The Future for Stem Cells
Making the Planet Better
Darwins Sacred Cause
Beyond Animal Rsearch
Faith in Evolution
Heresy - When to listen to the heretics

Friday
Climate Change - Whose Responsibility
Synthetic Biology

Saturday
A Lifetime of Intelligence
The Incredible Human Journey
The Times Debate: Your Genetic Future
Pain

Sunday
Digital Footprints - The Ethics

Thursday, 12 March 2009

Philosophy at the Movies


'The Matrix' is one of the most frequently used films when discussing films that explore philosophical themes.
In particular it questions the certainty we have about the world around us and draws from the ideas of Plato and Descartes...there is even a book about it!

Share your own suggestions for philosophical films and briefly explain why they are.

Consider the following themes;
  • Epistemology (knowledge)
  • Ethics
  • Philosophy of Mind & Personal Identity
  • Language
  • Politics
  • Theology
  • Critical Thinking
  • Determinism....

Useful website link;

Philosophical Films


Friday, 23 January 2009

'Darwin 200'


This year would be Darwins 200th birthday.

His ideas on evolution have had a huge effect on our understanding of the world, not just scientifically but also philosophically, with profound implications for religion and society.


Find out more by exploring the following links;




Monday, 8 December 2008

DNA database against human rights

Last week the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the storage of DNA and fingerprints (biodata) of innocent individuals in the UK was an infringement of human rights and “could not be regarded as necessary in a democratic society.” Such information breached a persons right to privacy.
Police have been ordered to destroy over 1.6 billion samples. The Government and police argue however that storing this information is a key weapon in fighting crime.
  1. Would you feel that your right to privacy had been violated if your DNA information were stored for police reference?
  2. Is the storage of this information reasonable if it helps the police do their job?
  3. Should everyone have their DNA on a database to help with police investigations? What issues might this raise?
  4. Is there an alternative solution?

Monday, 3 November 2008

In the news - Euthanasia: Debbie Purdy & Dan James


Purdy's Quest For Clarity
Debbie Purdy, 45, suffers from MS and plans to travel to Switzerland to end her life if her situation becomes unbearable. She has been seeking clarification from the courts on whether her husband will face prosecution if he helps her to do this.
Note;
'..since October 2002 up to 100 British citizens have travelled abroad for the purpose of lawfully obtaining an assisted suicide. But in no case had a prosecution resulted..' [www.timesonline.co.uk 30/10/08]

Her efforts have been unsuccessful, it was concluded that her '..human rights were not infringed by the current state of the law..' [www.timesonline.co.uk 30/10/08] Purdy plans to appeal but has also directed attention towards Parliament, stressing the need to reconsider the 1961 Suicide Act arguing for a change to the law on assisted suicide.

Debbie Purdy claims that she may have to end her life earlier than necessary (while she is still able to), in order to avoid putting her husband at risk of prosecution.
Click here for a clip from Sky news, a Times Online article and further links.

Dan James
23 year old Dan, from Worcester, played for Nuneaton Rugby Club where he became paralysed from the chest down following a training accident last year.
In September Dan travelled to a Swiss euthanasia clinic with his parents to receive assisted suicide. Police are currently investigating his death.

Dr Peter Saunders of the Care Not Killing Alliance fears a 'slippery slope' where assisted suicide has been granted initially for terminal conditions such as some cancers and motor neuron disease, then for chronic illness and now disabilities.
Click here for more on the case.
  • Should politicians review the law on assisted suicide and legalise it?
  • If it is legal in some countries, why not here?
  • Should we have the right to manage our own deaths?
  • Why do some people choose assisted suicide, whereas others do not?
  • Debbie Purdy sufferers from a terminal illness, Dan James from a disablility. Do these different circumstances raise different issues about legalising assisted suicide?
Links;
Dignity in Dying
Care Not Killing

Friday, 19 September 2008

Should people with dementia feel an obligation to die?


'People with dementia should be able to end their lives if they feel they are a burden to others or to the NHS, according to a respected ethicist...Baroness Mary Warnock'

'Rebecca Wood, chief executive of the Alzheimer’s Research Trust, strongly criticised the peer's comments.
"Lady Warnock demonstrates a shocking ignorance when espousing her highly insensitive view that people with dementia are 'wasting people’s lives' and may have a 'duty to die. ' [BBC News 19/9/08]

  • Are dementia sufferers an unacceptable drain on medical and family resources?

  • When, if ever, should a person feel a 'duty to die'?

  • Should dementia sufferers be valued differently to other people?

  • Should euthanasia be legalised in the UK?

Friday, 5 September 2008

Organ Donation and Presumed Consent

Over 8000 people each year are waiting for an organ donation (1000 die having not recieved one.) Currently people 'opt-in' to organ donation by carrying a donor card and/or signing up to the NHS Organ Donor Register to indicate their wishes after death.
Is a system of presumed consent the solution? Hospitals could assume consent to remove organs after an individual dies, unless they have 'opted out' or a family member objects.

Views:
The Prime Minister says that such a facility would save thousands of lives and that he hopes such a system can start this year. "A system of this kind seems to have the potential to close the aching gap between the potential benefits of transplant surgery in the UK and the limits imposed by our current system of consent," [12/4/08] (www.telegraph.co.uk)

Prof. John Fabre, from King's College London and a former president of the British Transplantation Society... "Presumed consent would degrade the ethical framework of our society and change a system of organ donation based on generosity and compassion into one of the state taking back what it thinks is its, while intruding on one of the most personal and delicate moments of a families life." [5/9/08] (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/)
  • What impact does presumed consent have on a persons rights over their own body?

  • Will there be a conflict of interests for medical staff in saving one life and seeking the organs to save another?
  • How will this impact on families? Could it be a more sensitive approach than medical staff having to ask about organ donation immediately after the death of a loved one?

  • Will it increase the numbers of lives saved?

Saturday, 9 August 2008

Sport and Politics: The Beijing Olympics


'In bidding for the 2008 Games, the Chinese promised to improve matters. Yet, under President Hu Jintao the government has tightened the screw on political dissidents, non-governmental organisations, internet users and ethnic minorities......It is often said that sport and politics should not mix. With the Games being wholly or partly financed by governments, they inevitably do...' [extract Telegraph.co.uk 11/4/08]


'Fears that tomorrow’s (6/4/08) Olympic flame relay through London could be disrupted by violence intensified after it emerged that eight Tibetan protesters had been shot dead by Chinese police.' [extract Timesonline 5/4/08]

'London's relay saw protesters trying to douse and even snatch the Olympic flame as athletes and celebrities carried it through the city.' [extract news.bbc 7/4/08]

[Image: New York City protest March 2008]

'More than 40 athletes taking part in the Beijing Olympics have today signed an open letter addressed to China's government urging it to respect human rights and freedom of religion, particularly in Tibet.' [extract Guardian.co.uk 7/8/08]

Four Free Tibet protesters including two Britons are arrested for hanging giant banners opposite Beijing's Olympic Stadium on a day of protests against the Chinese government. Watch here and for other protests and video viewpoints.
  • Should sport and politics be kept separate...can they be?

  • Should we or other countries have boycotted the olympics because of China's human rights issues - including restricted freedom of speech, internet censorship, detaining people, death penality, Tibet?

  • Has the olympics had a positive role in at least raising peoples awareness?
You may want to check out Amnesty Internationals' website.